On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:25:52PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Tobin C. Harding <m...@tobin.cc> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:00:03AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > >> Provided you've tested this and the static_key guard stuff actually > >> works as intended, > > > > I tested by inserting a simple module that calls printf() with a bunch of > > different specifiers. So it's tested but not stress tested. Some stress > > testing > > might be nice, no ideas how to go about that though. > > By the way, it occurred to me one thing you might want to verify > closely is whether or not that callback block executes from process > context and whether or not the static_key stuff sleeps. If both, > there's a problem.
Ok, will do. thanks, Tobin.