On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, Romain Izard wrote:
> The controller used by a flexcom module is configured at boot, and left
> alone after this. As the configuration will be lost after backup mode,
> restore the state of the flexcom driver on resume.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard....@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@microchip.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@microchip.com>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> * extract from the patch series, and send as a standalone patch
>
> drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c | 65
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c b/drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c
> index 064bde9cff5a..ef1235c4a179 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c
> @@ -39,34 +39,44 @@
> #define FLEX_MR_OPMODE(opmode) (((opmode) << FLEX_MR_OPMODE_OFFSET) &
> \
> FLEX_MR_OPMODE_MASK)
>
> +struct atmel_flexcom {
> + void __iomem *base;
> + u32 opmode;
> + struct clk *clk;
> +};
>
> static int atmel_flexcom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> - struct clk *clk;
> struct resource *res;
> - void __iomem *base;
> - u32 opmode;
> + struct atmel_flexcom *afc;
Nit: I'd prefer if you call this 'ddata'.
But the concept and implementation is fine, so if you're going to
change it please do so and apply my:
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
