Con Kolivas wrote: > On Monday 30 April 2007 18:05, Michael Gerdau wrote: > > meanwhile I've redone my numbercrunching tests with the following > > kernels: 2.6.21.1 (mainline) > > 2.6.21-sd046 > > 2.6.21-cfs-v6 > > running on a dualcore x86_64. > > [I will run the same test with 2.6.21.1-cfs-v7 over the next days, > > likely tonight] : : > > However from these figures it seems as if sd does provide for the > > fairest (as in equal share for all) scheduling among the 3 schedulers > > tested. > > Looks good, thanks. Ingo's been hard at work since then and has v8 out by > now. SD has not changed so you wouldn't need to do the whole lot of tests > on SD again unless you don't trust some of the results.
Well, I tried cfs-v8 and it still shows some nice regressions wrt mainline/sd. SD's nice-levels look rather solid, implying fairness. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
