On 20/10/2017 11:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 20/10/2017 09:49, David Kozub wrote: >> >> And it ends up to the bad commit (assuming there are no compilation >> broken patches in the process). > > I don't think it's worth the trouble for this particular issue. We already > know that the commit which made the spurious detection weaker. So we just > add that as Fixes tag and be done with it.
Yes, I'm fine with that. -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
