4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Harry Wentland <[email protected]> commit 6cecdf7a161d2b909dc7c8979176bbc4f0669968 upstream. This makes it possibly for drivers to find the associated mst_port by looking at the payload allocation table. Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Cc: Kai Heng Feng <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -1802,6 +1802,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct d return -EINVAL; } req_payload.num_slots = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]->num_slots; + req_payload.vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]->vcpi; } else { port = NULL; req_payload.num_slots = 0; @@ -1817,6 +1818,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct d if (req_payload.num_slots) { drm_dp_create_payload_step1(mgr, mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]->vcpi, &req_payload); mgr->payloads[i].num_slots = req_payload.num_slots; + mgr->payloads[i].vcpi = req_payload.vcpi; } else if (mgr->payloads[i].num_slots) { mgr->payloads[i].num_slots = 0; drm_dp_destroy_payload_step1(mgr, port, mgr->payloads[i].vcpi, &mgr->payloads[i]);
