> On Oct 18, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Michael Lyle <ml...@lyle.org> wrote: >>> On 10/16/2017 05:01 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to >>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() >>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >>> >>> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstr...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Shaohua Li <s...@kernel.org> >>> Cc: Alasdair Kergon <a...@redhat.com> >>> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snit...@redhat.com> >>> Cc: dm-de...@redhat.com >>> Cc: linux-bca...@vger.kernel.org >>> Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> >> >> This looks good to me-- I'm fine with Jens or someone else picking this >> up directly, or would take a bcache-specific one to apply to my tree. >> >> Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <ml...@lyle.org> > > Jens, can you pick this up, or would you prefer I split it up?
I can pick it up, but I don’t think I was ever cc’ed on the original.
