On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: > Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:47:10 -0700 >> Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to >>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() >>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >>> >>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> >>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> >>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> >>> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> >> >> Looks fine to me. Is this intended to be merged via the powerpc tree >> in the next merge window? > > It relies on the new timer_setup(), which is in one of tglx's trees (I > think). So I expect it to go via that tree.
It's in -rc3, but the timer tree can carry it if you want. Which do you prefer? -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
