On Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:19:48 AM CEST Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki > <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 10/17/2017 1:20 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > >> > >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer > >> to > >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and > >> from_timer() > >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. Removes test of .data field, since > >> that will be going away. > >> > >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net> > >> Cc: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> > >> Cc: Len Brown <len.br...@intel.com> > >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > >> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org > >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> > > > > > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > Do you want this to be carried in the timers tree, or can you pick it up?
I can pick it up, but only for 4.15. Thanks, Rafael
