* Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > And is this really a problem? The whole goal of the -stable tree was to > accomidate the users who relied on kernel.org kernels, and wanted > bugfixes and security updates. It was not for new features or new > hardware support. > > If people feel we should revisit this goal, then that's fine, and I have > no objection to that. But until then, I think the rules that we have > had in place for over the past 2 years should still remain in affect.
I have to agree. I went back through my mbox and found vanishingly few pci_id update patches. So it's not clear there's even a big issue. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
