Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:51AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
>
>> As usual voyager tripped over an explicit boot CPU is zero assumption in
>> the dynticks code. This is the fix I have queued in the voyager tree.
>>
>
> Can we flush out all these assumptions by adding a constant offset
> somewhere? Or reversing the ordering?
>
My understanding is that the boot CPU is random depending on who wins
the "I get to boot" bunfight.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
