Hi,
On 2017년 10월 12일 13:08, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2017년 10월 11일 21:57, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:15 PM, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo....@samsung.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> The existing {min|max}_freq sysfs nodes don't consider whether min/max_freq
>>>> are available or not. Those sysfs nodes show just the stored value
>>>> in the struct devfreq.
>>>>
>>>> The devfreq uses the OPP interface and then dev_pm_opp_{disable|add}()
>>>> might change the state of the device's supported frequency. This patch
>>>> shows the available minimum and maximum frequency through sysfs node.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.c...@samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>> index 2ce1fd0a1324..799a0cf75d39 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>> @@ -1128,7 +1128,14 @@ static ssize_t min_freq_store(struct device *dev,
>>>> struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> static ssize_t min_freq_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute
>>>> *attr,
>>>> char *buf)
>>>> {
>>>> - return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", to_devfreq(dev)->min_freq);
>>>> + struct devfreq *df = to_devfreq(dev);
>>>> + unsigned long min_freq = to_devfreq(dev)->min_freq;
>>>> + unsigned long available_min_freq = find_available_min_freq(df);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (available_min_freq != 0 && min_freq < available_min_freq)
>>>
>>> nitpick:
>>>
>>> If available_min_freq == 0,
>>> it can't be min_freq < available_min_freq anyway;
>>> it's unsigned.
>>
>> If the dev_pm_opp_find_*() return the error in the find_available_min_freq(),
>> avaiable_min_freq is zero. So, if available_min_freq is zero,
>> min_freq_show doesn't need to compare 'min_freq < available_min_freq'.
>>
>> In result, if 'available_min_freq' is zero, min_freq_show() only considers
>> the 'min_freq' variable.
>
> I'll modify this patch as following: How about that?
>
> + if (available_min_freq == 0)
> + goto out;
> + else if (min_freq < available_min_freq)
> + min_freq = available_min_freq;
> +
> +out:
> + return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", min_freq);
>
Please ignore this approach because
I'll use the new 'scaling_min/max_freq' variables on v4.
>
>>>
>>>> + min_freq = available_min_freq;
>>>> +
>>>> + return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", min_freq);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static ssize_t max_freq_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute
>>>> *attr,
>>>> @@ -1162,7 +1169,14 @@ static ssize_t max_freq_store(struct device *dev,
>>>> struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> static ssize_t max_freq_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute
>>>> *attr,
>>>> char *buf)
>>>> {
>>>> - return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", to_devfreq(dev)->max_freq);
>>>> + struct devfreq *df = to_devfreq(dev);
>>>> + unsigned long max_freq = to_devfreq(dev)->max_freq;
>>>> + unsigned long available_max_freq = find_available_max_freq(df);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (available_max_freq != 0 && max_freq > available_max_freq)
>>>> + max_freq = available_max_freq;
>>>
>>> similar here.
>>
>> ditto.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", max_freq);
>>>> }
>>>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(max_freq);
>>
>>
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
