Hi Alex, > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre TORGUE > Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 9:02 AM > To: Vikas MANOCHA <vikas.mano...@st.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chot...@st.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Arm: dts: stm32: remove extra compatible uart string > > Hi Vikas > > > On 09/29/2017 12:51 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote: > > stm32 uart driver is using two compatible strings "st,stm32-usart" > > & "st,stm32-uart". One can be removed safely to save some space & time. > > > > Vikas Manocha (3): > > Arm: dts: stm32: remove extra compatible string for uart > > Arm: dts: stm32: remove extra compatible string from DT & driver > > ARM: dts: stm32h7: correct uart nodes compatible string > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt | 2 +- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/st,stm32-usart.txt | 10 > > +++------- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi | 12 > > ++++++------ > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f746.dtsi | 12 > > ++++++------ > > arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi | 4 ++-- > > drivers/tty/serial/stm32-usart.c | 3 --- > > 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > > > I think it is better to put people in CC of patch 1, 2, 3 also in CC of > cover-letter.
I am not sure how to add relevant people in cover-letter, Get_maintainers script works for the patches only. > I think you should split patches differently. Maybe one > for drivers and bindings (doc) updates. And others for DT updates. Yes, it's like this only. First patch is DT binding & second is its implementation in the driver & stm32 device tree. > > Conerning DT patches, all headers should start by "ARM: dts: stm32: blabla" Yes, Same headers is used for the patch. You mean "arm" should be "ARM" ? Cheers, Vikas > > Regards > Alex
