There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and
none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here.
Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 include/asm-i386/i387.h |   11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/i387.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-i386/i387.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/i387.h
@@ -74,11 +74,12 @@ static inline void __save_init_fpu( stru
        task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
 }
 
-#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do { \
-       if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) \
-               save_init_fpu( tsk );                   \
-       else                                            \
-               tsk->fpu_counter = 0;                   \
+#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do {                               \
+       if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) {       \
+               __save_init_fpu(tsk);                           \
+               stts();                                         \
+       } else                                                  \
+               tsk->fpu_counter = 0;                           \
 } while (0)
 
 #define __clear_fpu( tsk )                                     \

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to