On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:18:09AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > Roland's idea of single-stepping is that it *must* be supported by > hardware for utrace to use it. There are a number of architectures > which can only do single-stepping by modifying the text of the > program being single stepped. ARM is one such example. > > As such, even when utrace is complete, some architectures will never > support in-kernel single step with utrace. I believe Roland's idea > is to have single step supported on these via some vapourware userspace > library.
Does the current arm ptrace code support single stepping in kernelspace? If yes we absolutely need to continue to support it. > I'd also like to see utrace become *optional* > for architectures to support, rather than as it currently stands as > a *mandatory* requirement when merged. No way we'd keep both the old ptrace mess and utrace in the same tree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/