On 9/27/2017 6:05 AM, gengdongjiu wrote:
Tyler, Stephen
On 2017/9/27 3:23, Tyler Baicar wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdong...@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbai...@codeaurora.org>
Tested this functionality using SEA support.
++Stephen,
Something to be aware of, this patch will conflict with
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/14/663
It may make sense to just remove the conditions for the NMI configs as part of
this patch or in a series with this patch to avoid merge conflicts.
In your patch, you only remove ACPI_APEI_SEA for the
ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG, do you need to remove it for the HAVE_NMI?
From the latest comments it sounds like Stephen was going to remove it
from both.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/15/350
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 3dcd7ec..8055997 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ config ARM64
select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX
select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
+ select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG if ACPI_APEI_SEA
select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
@@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ config ARM64
select HAVE_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP if NUMA
+ select HAVE_NMI if ACPI_APEI_SEA
select HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM
select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
select HAVE_PERF_REGS
Thanks,
Tyler
---
