Hi Steve, On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 12:31 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:57:12 -0500 > Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is V2 of the inter-event tracing patchset. > > > > Hi Tom, > > I was wondering if you had a v3 ready? I would like to get it into the > next merge window, but I would also like it to be in linux-next early, > which means we need the next version rather soon (hopefully that will > be the last version). >
Yeah, it's almost ready. At this point, I've addressed all the comments except for: - PATCH v2 25/40] tracing: Add support for dynamic tracepoints which I need to do a little bit of research on to figure out what exactly I need to do there. I was also kind of looking for a couple patches from you to fold in which you had mentioned you were going to send for: - [PATCH v2 35/40] tracing: Reverse the order event_mutex/trace_types_lock are taken - [PATCH v2 40/40] tracing: Add trace_event_buffer_reserve() variant that allows recursion I've been using the trace_recursive_lock() patch you posted in place of the latter and it's working fine. :-) Tom > -- Steve
