On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:25:17 +0200 Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > __attribute__ __address_will_be_overwritten_so_don't_bother_warning_me__? > > > > /me going to read gcc docs... > > Sorry, no such thing in the docs to do > > spinlock_t __attribute__((__uninitialized__)) *ptl; > > in order to suppress warnings. Bummer. Thanks for checking. > But if function size is our concern here, even > shorter would be: > > Index: linux-mm/mm/memory.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-mm.orig/mm/memory.c 2007-04-26 19:57:14.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-mm/mm/memory.c 2007-04-26 20:00:30.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1488,7 +1488,7 @@ > pte_t *pte; > int err; > struct page *pmd_page; > - spinlock_t *ptl; > + spinlock_t *ptl = 0; > > pte = (mm == &init_mm) ? > pte_alloc_kernel(pmd, addr) : hm, that'll have the same seven-byte cost as `= NULL;', won't it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
