On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Don't bother. I found it already. On UP we have:
>
> #define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) \
> for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
>
> which is a total fail as it breaks any code which uses for_each_cpu() or
> any of the other variants on UP by assuming that all cpumask have bit 0
> set.
It's fairly fundamental. UP assumes that all CPU masks are always that
"one CPU set". Not just here - everywhere.
I guess we could somehow try to move away from that, but really, the
assumption of fixed masks ends up simplifying the code generation a
lot, so it made tons of sense back when UP was a primary target.
So it's an approach that is somewhat historical, but I'm not sure it's
worth re-visiting that old decision. People should simply not expect
to traverse over empty masks in anything that is UP.
So I suspect your perf fix is the right one, and maybe we could/should
just make people more aware of the empty cpumask issue with UP.
Linus
