4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com> commit b4ccec41af82b5a5518c6534444412961894f07c upstream. online_mem_sections() accidentally marks online only the first section in the given range. This is a typo which hasn't been noticed because I haven't tested large 2GB blocks previously. All users of pfn_to_online_page would get confused on the the rest of the pfn range in the block. All we need to fix this is to use iterator (pfn) rather than start_pfn. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170904112210.3401-1-mho...@kernel.org Fixes: 2d070eab2e82 ("mm: consider zone which is not fully populated to have holes") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- mm/sparse.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/mm/sparse.c +++ b/mm/sparse.c @@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ void online_mem_sections(unsigned long s unsigned long pfn; for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) { - unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(start_pfn); + unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn); struct mem_section *ms; /* onlining code should never touch invalid ranges */
