On Wed 2017-09-06 22:27:49, Helge Deller wrote:
> Use the %pS printk format for printing symbols from direct addresses.
> In usermode-linux there is actually no difference between %pS and %pF, but for
> consistency throughout the kernel fix the wrong usage here too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de>
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jd...@addtoit.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>
> Cc: user-mode-linux-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> ---
> arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> index 6b995e8..05585ee 100644
> --- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>
> static void _print_addr(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
> {
> - pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pF\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
> + pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
> (void *)address);
This seems to be used to print addresses from the stack.
IMHO, we should use %pB here.
Best Regards,
Petr
