In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:25:01 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > Quick removal of unnecessary initialization to 0. > > Quite the contrary. The patch seems correct and useful to me. What do you > think is wrong with it? (Linus accepted megabytes worth of the above in > the past...) What irritates about these monkey-see-monkey-do patches is that if I initialize a variable to NULL, it's because my code actually relies on it; I don't want that information eliminated. Rusty. -- Hacking time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" fr... Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "st... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] removal of &qu... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static... Rusty Russell
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "st... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [PATCH] removal of &qu... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "st... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] removal of &qu... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "st... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "st... Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo... Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0... David Hinds
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo... Tigran Aivazian