On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 16:39 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Good point. Though if we go for passing the interrupt-enable setting as > an argument then many drivers will have the same > "if (irqs_disabled()) return" code. Hm. I guess passing it isn't even > strictly necessary.
Eh, the point I actually wanted to make is that many drivers don't care for the irqs disabled case and would have to add code to exclude it. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
