Hi Steve, On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 18:02 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:57:37 -0500 > Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > The tracepoint infrastructure assumes statically-defined tracepoints > > and uses static_keys for tracepoint enablement. In order to define > > tracepoints on the fly, we need to have a dynamic counterpart. > > Do we? > > I believe the static keys should work just fine if you don't have any > defined static keys jumps, and they should work as a simple counter. > > Could we do that instead of adding another variable to a structure that > is defined over a thousand times? Save us 4k of memory. >
OK, yeah, makes sense if possible - let me look into that... Tom
