On Tue,  5 Sep 2017 16:57:20 -0500
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/ring_buffer.h b/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
> index 28e3472..74bc276 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
> @@ -36,10 +36,12 @@ struct ring_buffer_event {
>   *                            array[0] = time delta (28 .. 59)
>   *                            size = 8 bytes
>   *
> - * @RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP: Sync time stamp with external clock
> - *                            array[0]    = tv_nsec
> - *                            array[1..2] = tv_sec
> - *                            size = 16 bytes
> + * @RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP: Absolute timestamp
> + *                            Same format as TIME_EXTEND except that the
> + *                            value is an absolute timestamp, not a delta
> + *                            event.time_delta contains bottom 27 bits
> + *                            array[0] = top (28 .. 59) bits
> + *                            size = 8 bytes

Is it going to be an issue that our time stamp is only 59 bits?

2^59 = 576,460,752,303,423,488

Thus, 2^59 nanoseconds (I doubt we will need to have precision better
than nanoseconds) = 576,460,752 seconds = 9,607,679 minutes = 160,127
hours = 6,671 days = 18 years.

We would be screwed if we trace for more than 18 years. ;-)

That's why I had it as 16 bytes, to be able to hold a full 64 bit
timestamp (and still be 8 byte aligned). But since we've gone this long
without needing this, I'm sure a 59 bit absolute timestamp should be
good enough.

>   *
>   * <= @RINGBUF_TYPE_DATA_TYPE_LEN_MAX:
>   *                           Data record
> @@ -56,12 +58,12 @@ enum ring_buffer_type {
>       RINGBUF_TYPE_DATA_TYPE_LEN_MAX = 28,
>       RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING,
>       RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_EXTEND,
> -     /* FIXME: RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP not implemented */
>       RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP,
>  };
>  
>  unsigned ring_buffer_event_length(struct ring_buffer_event *event);
>  void *ring_buffer_event_data(struct ring_buffer_event *event);
> +u64 ring_buffer_event_time_stamp(struct ring_buffer_event *event);
>  
>  /*
>   * ring_buffer_discard_commit will remove an event that has not




> @@ -2488,6 +2519,10 @@ static inline void rb_event_discard(struct 
> ring_buffer_event *event)
>  {
>       u64 delta;
>  
> +     /* In TIME_STAMP mode, write_stamp is unused, nothing to do */

No, we still need to keep the write_stamp updated. Sure, it doesn't use
it, but I do want to have absolute and delta timestamps working
together in a single buffer. It shouldn't be one or the other. In fact,
I plan on using it that way for nested events.

Maybe for this feature we can let it slide. But I will be working on
fixing that.

-- Steve

> +     if (event->type_len == RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP)
> +             return;
> +
>       /*
>        * The event first in the commit queue updates the
>        * time stamp.
> @@ -2501,9 +2536,7 @@ static inline void rb_event_discard(struct 
> ring_buffer_event *event)
>                       cpu_buffer->write_stamp =
>                               cpu_buffer->commit_page->page->time_stamp;
>               else if (event->type_len == RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_EXTEND) {
> -                     delta = event->array[0];
> -                     delta <<= TS_SHIFT;
> -                     delta += event->time_delta;
> +                     delta = ring_buffer_event_time_stamp(event);
>                       cpu_buffer->write_stamp += delta;
>               } else

Reply via email to