On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 09:54 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.20.10 release. > There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let > us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. > > These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the Cc: > line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to > add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list, > also email us.
Hi Greg: I am just wondering that is there any rule for stable kernel version release? AFAIK, 2.6.x kernels are all stable release and 2.6.x.y is for stable tree bug fixing and long term supporting. But I found 2.6.16.y got 49 version updating, it is more active than other stable release such as 2.6.17 and 2.6.19. It looks like 2.6.16 is a long-long term supporting version and even number 2.6.x kernel is more active than odd number 2.6.x kernel. You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and long term support kernel instead to use the latest one. Could you please give us some idea about this regular? Thanks -Bryan Wu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
