On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:01 -0700, hechacker1 wrote: <snip> > Overall: > SD-0.46 is my new choice for scheduler. When not under load everything > run's better or similarly to cfs or mainline. Under load however it > shows the most responsiveness. > > Occasionally I had complete mouse freezes with cfs when the system was > busy. But rarely. > > Under SD i haven't seen anything get starved. > > mainline surprisingly works better than i expected, but beryl suffers > and responsiveness suffers under load.
Your findings seems somewhat similar to mine, what i have observed is that SD is much more smooth, with vanilla/cfs, under just abit load opengl stuff will stutter, whereas with sd it will simply get slightly(or more, depending on the load) lower fps. > > --hechacker1 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
