On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:03:21PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> > +static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops dmic_dai_ops = {
> > + .trigger = dmic_daiops_trigger,
> > +};> should it be handle by trigger or DAPM? DAPM is a bit better, yes. I don't think it matters *overly* much in this case where there's nothing else going on with the device, though bypass use cases would need it. OTOH it could mess up the timing. I was on the edge with this one but I decided that if it ends up making a problem the binding is fine and the code can be sorted later.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
