The update_sit_entry provides this:
...
1658 if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
1659 se->ckpt_valid_blocks += del;
...
As a result, the ckpt_valid_blocks is always larger than valid_blocks.
If not correct, can you provide
the case valid_blocks larger than ckpt_valid_blocks?
On 2017/9/4 9:17, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2017/9/1 20:14, Yunlong Song wrote:
se->ckpt_valid_blocks is always larger than se->valid_blocks, so
get_ssr_cost can be cleared.
I think this is not correct.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.s...@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/gc.c | 11 +----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index cd147e7..b226760 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -277,20 +277,11 @@ static unsigned int get_greedy_cost(struct f2fs_sb_info
*sbi,
valid_blocks * 2 : valid_blocks;
}
-static unsigned int get_ssr_cost(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
- unsigned int segno)
-{
- struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
-
- return se->ckpt_valid_blocks > se->valid_blocks ?
- se->ckpt_valid_blocks : se->valid_blocks;
-}
-
static inline unsigned int get_gc_cost(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
unsigned int segno, struct victim_sel_policy *p)
{
if (p->alloc_mode == SSR)
- return get_ssr_cost(sbi, segno);
+ return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks;
/* alloc_mode == LFS */
if (p->gc_mode == GC_GREEDY)
.
--
Thanks,
Yunlong Song
