On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> From: Victor Chibotaru <tch...@google.com>
>>
>> Enables kcov to collect comparison operands from instrumented code.
>> This is done by using Clang's -fsanitize=trace-cmp instrumentation
>> (currently not available for GCC).
>
> What's needed to build the kernel with Clang these days?
>
> I was under the impression that it still wasn't possible to build arm64
> with clang due to a number of missing features (e.g. the %a assembler
> output template).
>
>> The comparison operands help a lot in fuzz testing. E.g. they are
>> used in Syzkaller to cover the interiors of conditional statements
>> with way less attempts and thus make previously unreachable code
>> reachable.
>>
>> To allow separate collection of coverage and comparison operands two
>> different work modes are implemented. Mode selection is now done via
>> a KCOV_ENABLE ioctl call with corresponding argument value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Victor Chibotaru <tch...@google.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.po...@linux.com>
>> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com>
>> Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
>> Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nos...@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasno...@oracle.com>
>> Cc: syzkal...@googlegroups.com
>> Cc: linux...@kvack.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> Clang instrumentation:
>> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html#tracing-data-flow
>
> How stable is this?
>
> The comment at the end says "This interface is a subject to change."


The intention is that this is not subject to change anymore (since we
are using it in kernel).
I've mailed change to docs: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37303

FWIW, there is patch in flight that adds this instrumentation to gcc:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/syzkaller/CSLynn6nI-A
It seems to be stalled on review phase, though.

Reply via email to