Hi Bjorn,
On 07/19/2017 11:59 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 10:26 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting
>> reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls
>> to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset
>> control behavior. Convert all drivers requesting exclusive resets to the
>> explicit API call so the temporary transition helpers can be removed.
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <o...@wizery.com>
>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>
>> Cc: linux-remotep...@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>
>
> Acked-by: Suman Anna <s-a...@ti.com>
Can you pick this one and the other 2 related remoteproc patches?
Believe the subsystem maintainers have been picking these up, I see some
of the other related patches in linux-next but not these.
regards
Suman
>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
>> index 5f776bfd674a0..920fef072b364 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int keystone_rproc_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> if (ret)
>> goto free_rproc;
>>
>> - ksproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get(dev, NULL);
>> + ksproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
>> if (IS_ERR(ksproc->reset)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(ksproc->reset);
>> goto free_rproc;
>>
>
