Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > This is mostly a heads-up to say that in this regard gcc is not ready
> > for prime time, so we really can't get away with using if() as an ifdef
> > yet, at least not without penalty.
>
> Humm.. whats the Advantage of this?
Advantage of what?
If you mean preferring 'if ()' over 'ifdef'... Linus. :) And I agree
with him: code looks -much- more clean without ifdefs. And the
compiler should be smart enough to completely eliminate code inside an
'if (0)' code block.
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
