The instructions str and sldt are not recognized when running on virtual-
8086 mode and generate an invalid operand exception. These two
instructions are protected by the Intel User-Mode Instruction Prevention
(UMIP) security feature. In protected mode, if UMIP is enabled, these
instructions generate a general protection fault if called from CPL > 0.
Linux traps the general protection fault and emulates the instructions
sgdt, sidt and smsw; but not str and sldt.

These tests are added to verify that the emulation code does not emulate
these two instructions but the expected invalid operand exception is
seen.

Tests fallback to exit with int3 in case emulation does happen.

Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Chen Yucong <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Huang Rui <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]>
Cc: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <[email protected]>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
index 130e8ad1db05..b7a0c9024477 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ asm (
        "smsw %ax\n\t"
        "mov %ax, (2080)\n\t"
        "int3\n\t"
+       "vmcode_umip_str:\n\t"
+       "str %eax\n\t"
+       "vmcode_umip_sldt:\n\t"
+       "sldt %eax\n\t"
+       "int3\n\t"
        ".size vmcode, . - vmcode\n\t"
        "end_vmcode:\n\t"
        ".code32\n\t"
@@ -119,7 +124,8 @@ asm (
 
 extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[];
 extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[],
-       vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[];
+       vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[],
+       vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[];
 
 /* Returns false if the test was skipped. */
 static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
@@ -226,6 +232,16 @@ void do_umip_tests(struct vm86plus_struct *vm86, unsigned 
char *test_mem)
                printf("[FAIL]\tAll the results of SIDT should be the same.\n");
        else
                printf("[PASS]\tAll the results from SIDT are identical.\n");
+
+       sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
+       do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip_str - vmcode, VM86_SIGNAL, 0,
+               "STR instruction");
+       clearhandler(SIGILL);
+
+       sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
+       do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip_sldt - vmcode, VM86_SIGNAL, 0,
+               "SLDT instruction");
+       clearhandler(SIGILL);
 }
 
 int main(void)
-- 
2.13.0

Reply via email to