Hi. On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 10:48 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 07:23 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I absolutely detest all suspend-to-disk crap. Quite frankly, I hate the > > > whole thing. I think they've _all_ caused problems for the "true" suspend > > > (suspend-to-ram), and the last thing I want to see is three or four > > > > Well, it is a bit more complex than that. > > > > suspend-to-disk is a workaround for > > > > 'suspend-to-ram eats too much power' (plus some details like > > being able to replace battery). > > > > suspend-to-ram is a workaround for > > > > 'idle machine takes way too much power' (plus some details > > like don't spin the disk so that machine is safe to carry). > > I think it depends on who you ask. I personally think that suspend-to- > $youchoose is a workaround for the slowness of system startup. I never > turn off my laptop, I just suspend it. > > (And guess what, it uses APM and suspend is really faster and way more > reliable than each kernel implementation I could try).
If you tried Suspend2 and had problems with reliability, please send me logs. I'll do all I can to help. (I have to qualify it a bit, because I'm not able to fix drivers, but if it's a Suspend2 issue, tell me and I'll fix it). Regards, Nigel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
