Il giorno mar, 24/04/2007 alle 18.11 -0400, Gerhard Mack ha scritto: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > --- Gerhard Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you're daring you could propose that low number ports be treated > > the same way as other ports, with the default ownership being root and > > the default ACL allowing only root. > > ACL may be more complicated than needed when a simple GID addition would > make this right about perfect. The unix way(TM) for specifying multiple uid is...ehm.. groups :) I will add the gid,tcp_gid and udp_gid configfs attributes in the next release. The 'check order' will be: uidbind/<port>/<ip>/<proto>_uid uidbind/<port>/<ip>/uid uidbind/<port>/<proto>_uid uidbind/<port>/uid uidbind/<port>/<ip>/<proto>_gid uidbind/<port>/<ip>/gid uidbind/<port>/<proto>_gid uidbind/<port>/gid I am investigating the possibility of port-range use, particularly the overlap checks and performance problems. -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wii: 2999 4476 3509 0964
signature.asc
Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
