As Boqun pointed out, current->hist_id should be aligned with the latest
valid xhlock->hist_id so that hist_id_save[] storing current->hist_id
can be comparable with xhlock->hist_id. Fix it.

Additionally, the condition for overwrite-detection should be the
opposite. Fix it with modifying comment.

           <- direction to visit
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh (h: history)
                 ^^        ^
                 ||        start from here
                 |previous entry
                 current entry

Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 1ae4258..f0e6649 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4853,7 +4853,7 @@ static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock *hlock)
 
        /* Initialize hist_lock's members */
        xhlock->hlock = *hlock;
-       xhlock->hist_id = current->hist_id++;
+       xhlock->hist_id = ++current->hist_id;
 
        xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 0;
        xhlock->trace.max_entries = MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES;
@@ -5030,11 +5030,11 @@ static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_lock *xlock)
 
                        /*
                         * Filter out the cases that the ring buffer was
-                        * overwritten and the previous entry has a bigger
-                        * hist_id than the following one, which is impossible
+                        * overwritten and the current entry has a bigger
+                        * hist_id than the previous one, which is impossible
                         * otherwise.
                         */
-                       if (unlikely(before(xhlock->hist_id, prev_hist_id)))
+                       if (unlikely(before(prev_hist_id, xhlock->hist_id)))
                                break;
 
                        prev_hist_id = xhlock->hist_id;
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to