On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 23:51 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > +static int reset_simple_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> > + of_match_device(of_match_ptr(reset_simple_dt_ids), dev);
> > + const struct reset_simple_devdata *devdata = of_id->data;
>
> Just use of_device_get_match_data().
Will do that, thanks.
> > +struct reset_simple_data {
> > + spinlock_t lock;
> > + void __iomem *membase;
> > + struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
> > + bool inverted;
>
> You should document this option. "Inverted" by itself does not
> say a whole lot, as there is no mention about what the normal
> or non-inverted behavior is. Is the reset active low (assert
> reset when bit is cleared)? Or active high (assert reset when
> bit is set)?
You are right. Also, maybe I should rename this to
"bool active_low;" to avoid confusion where it is used.
regards
Philipp
