On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:12:53PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> @@ -4773,14 +4784,28 @@ void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const 
> int line, const char *s)
>   */
>  void crossrelease_hist_start(enum context_t c)
>  {
> -     if (current->xhlocks)
> -             current->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = current->xhlock_idx;
> +     struct task_struct *cur = current;
> +
> +     if (cur->xhlocks) {
> +             cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = cur->xhlock_idx;
> +             cur->hist_id_save[c] = cur->hist_id;
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  void crossrelease_hist_end(enum context_t c)
>  {
> -     if (current->xhlocks)
> -             current->xhlock_idx = current->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
> +     struct task_struct *cur = current;
> +
> +     if (cur->xhlocks) {
> +             unsigned int idx = cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
> +             struct hist_lock *h = &xhlock(idx);
> +
> +             cur->xhlock_idx = idx;
> +
> +             /* Check if the ring was overwritten. */
> +             if (h->hist_id != cur->hist_id_save[c])
> +                     invalidate_xhlock(h);
> +     }
>  }
>  
>  static int cross_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
> @@ -4826,6 +4851,7 @@ static inline int depend_after(struct held_lock *hlock)
>   * Check if the xhlock is valid, which would be false if,
>   *
>   *    1. Has not used after initializaion yet.
> + *    2. Got invalidated.
>   *
>   * Remind hist_lock is implemented as a ring buffer.
>   */
> @@ -4857,6 +4883,7 @@ static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock *hlock)
>  
>       /* Initialize hist_lock's members */
>       xhlock->hlock = *hlock;
> +     xhlock->hist_id = current->hist_id++;
>  
>       xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 0;
>       xhlock->trace.max_entries = MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES;


Hehe, _another_ scheme...

Yes I think this works.. but I had just sort of understood the last one.

How about I do this on top? That I think is a combination of what I
proposed last and your single invalidate thing. Combined they solve the
problem with the least amount of extra storage (a single int).


---
Subject: lockdep: Simplify xhlock ring buffer invalidation
From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Date: Wed Aug 9 15:31:27 CEST 2017


Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  |   20 -----------
 include/linux/sched.h    |    4 --
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |   82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -284,26 +284,6 @@ struct held_lock {
  */
 struct hist_lock {
        /*
-        * Id for each entry in the ring buffer. This is used to
-        * decide whether the ring buffer was overwritten or not.
-        *
-        * For example,
-        *
-        *           |<----------- hist_lock ring buffer size ------->|
-        *           pppppppppppppppppppppiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
-        * wrapped > iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.......................
-        *
-        *           where 'p' represents an acquisition in process
-        *           context, 'i' represents an acquisition in irq
-        *           context.
-        *
-        * In this example, the ring buffer was overwritten by
-        * acquisitions in irq context, that should be detected on
-        * rollback or commit.
-        */
-       unsigned int hist_id;
-
-       /*
         * Seperate stack_trace data. This will be used at commit step.
         */
        struct stack_trace      trace;
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -855,9 +855,7 @@ struct task_struct {
        unsigned int xhlock_idx;
        /* For restoring at history boundaries */
        unsigned int xhlock_idx_hist[XHLOCK_NR];
-       unsigned int hist_id;
-       /* For overwrite check at each context exit */
-       unsigned int hist_id_save[XHLOCK_NR];
+       unsigned int xhlock_idx_max;
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4818,26 +4818,65 @@ void crossrelease_hist_start(enum contex
 {
        struct task_struct *cur = current;
 
-       if (cur->xhlocks) {
+       if (cur->xhlocks)
                cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = cur->xhlock_idx;
-               cur->hist_id_save[c] = cur->hist_id;
-       }
 }
 
 void crossrelease_hist_end(enum context_t c)
 {
        struct task_struct *cur = current;
+       unsigned int idx;
 
-       if (cur->xhlocks) {
-               unsigned int idx = cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
-               struct hist_lock *h = &xhlock(idx);
-
-               cur->xhlock_idx = idx;
-
-               /* Check if the ring was overwritten. */
-               if (h->hist_id != cur->hist_id_save[c])
-                       invalidate_xhlock(h);
-       }
+       if (!cur->xhlocks)
+               return;
+
+       idx = cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
+       cur->xhlock_idx = idx;
+
+       /*
+        * A bit of magic here.. this deals with rewinding the (cyclic) history
+        * array further than its size. IOW. looses the complete history.
+        *
+        * We detect this by tracking the previous oldest entry we've (over)
+        * written in @xhlock_idx_max, this means the next entry is the oldest
+        * entry still in the buffer, ie. its tail.
+        *
+        * So when we restore an @xhlock_idx that is at least MAX_XHLOCKS_NR
+        * older than @xhlock_idx_max we know we've just wiped the entire
+        * history.
+        */
+       if ((cur->xhlock_idx_max - idx) < MAX_XHLOCKS_NR)
+               return;
+
+       /*
+        * Now that we know the buffer is effectively empty, reset our state
+        * such that it appears empty (without in fact clearing the entire
+        * buffer).
+        *
+        * Pick @idx as the 'new' beginning, (re)set all save-points to not
+        * rewind past it and reset the max. Then invalidate this idx such that
+        * commit_xhlocks() will never rewind past it. Since xhlock_idx_inc()
+        * will return the _next_ entry, we'll not overwrite this invalid entry
+        * until the entire buffer is full again.
+        */
+       for (c = 0; c < XHLOCK_NR; c++)
+               cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = idx;
+       cur->xhlock_idx_max = idx;
+       invalidate_xhlock(&xhlock(idx));
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int xhlock_idx_inc(void)
+{
+       struct task_struct *cur = current;
+       unsigned int idx = ++cur->xhlock_idx;
+
+       /*
+        * As per the requirement in crossrelease_hist_end(), track the tail.
+        */
+       if ((int)(cur->xhlock_idx_max - idx) < 0)
+               cur->xhlock_idx_max = idx;
+
+       return idx;
 }
 
 static int cross_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
@@ -4902,7 +4941,7 @@ static inline int xhlock_valid(struct hi
  */
 static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock *hlock)
 {
-       unsigned int idx = ++current->xhlock_idx;
+       unsigned int idx = xhlock_idx_inc();
        struct hist_lock *xhlock = &xhlock(idx);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
@@ -4915,7 +4954,6 @@ static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock
 
        /* Initialize hist_lock's members */
        xhlock->hlock = *hlock;
-       xhlock->hist_id = current->hist_id++;
 
        xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 0;
        xhlock->trace.max_entries = MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES;
@@ -5071,7 +5109,6 @@ static int commit_xhlock(struct cross_lo
 static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_lock *xlock)
 {
        unsigned int cur = current->xhlock_idx;
-       unsigned int prev_hist_id = xhlock(cur).hist_id;
        unsigned int i;
 
        if (!graph_lock())
@@ -5091,17 +5128,6 @@ static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_
                                break;
 
                        /*
-                        * Filter out the cases that the ring buffer was
-                        * overwritten and the previous entry has a bigger
-                        * hist_id than the following one, which is impossible
-                        * otherwise.
-                        */
-                       if (unlikely(before(xhlock->hist_id, prev_hist_id)))
-                               break;
-
-                       prev_hist_id = xhlock->hist_id;
-
-                       /*
                         * commit_xhlock() returns 0 with graph_lock already
                         * released if fail.
                         */
@@ -5186,11 +5212,9 @@ void lockdep_init_task(struct task_struc
        int i;
 
        task->xhlock_idx = UINT_MAX;
-       task->hist_id = 0;
 
        for (i = 0; i < XHLOCK_NR; i++) {
                task->xhlock_idx_hist[i] = UINT_MAX;
-               task->hist_id_save[i] = 0;
        }
 
        task->xhlocks = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hist_lock) * MAX_XHLOCKS_NR,

Reply via email to