On 04-08-17, 14:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > The if () in cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs() is superfluous, so drop > it and simply return the value of the expression under it. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > --- > > On top of the current linux-next. > > --- > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h > +++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h > @@ -578,11 +578,8 @@ static inline bool cpufreq_can_do_remote > * - dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu flag is set > * - the local and remote CPUs share cpufreq policy > */ > - if (policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu || > - cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), policy->cpus)) > - return true; > - > - return false; > + return policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu || > + cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), policy->cpus); > } > > /*********************************************************************
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> -- viresh
