On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 11:15:39AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> @@ -772,6 +780,10 @@ struct perf_event_context {
>        */
>       u64                             time;
>       u64                             timestamp;
> +     /*
> +      * Context cache for filtered out events;
> +      */
> +     struct perf_event_tstamp        tstamp_data;
>  
>       /*
>        * These fields let us detect when two contexts have both


> @@ -1379,6 +1379,9 @@ static void update_context_time(struct 
> perf_event_context *ctx)
>  
>       ctx->time += now - ctx->timestamp;
>       ctx->timestamp = now;
> +
> +     ctx->tstamp_data.running += ctx->time - ctx->tstamp_data.stopped;
> +     ctx->tstamp_data.stopped = ctx->time;
>  }
>  
>  static u64 perf_event_time(struct perf_event *event)

It appears to me we have some redundancy here.


> @@ -1968,9 +1971,13 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
>        */
>       if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE &&
>           !event_filter_match(event)) {
> +             delta = tstamp - event->tstamp->stopped;
> +             event->tstamp->running += delta;
> +             event->tstamp->stopped = tstamp;
> +             if (event->tstamp != &event->tstamp_data) {
> +                     event->tstamp_data = *event->tstamp;

This,

> +                     event->tstamp = &event->tstamp_data;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)


> @@ -3239,8 +3246,11 @@ ctx_pinned_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void 
> *data)
>  
>       if (event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
>               return 0;
> -     if (!event_filter_match(event))
> +     if (!event_filter_match(event)) {
> +             if (event->tstamp != &params->ctx->tstamp_data)
> +                     event->tstamp = &params->ctx->tstamp_data;

this and

>               return 0;
> +     }
>  
>       /* may need to reset tstamp_enabled */
>       if (is_cgroup_event(event))
> @@ -3273,8 +3283,11 @@ ctx_flexible_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void 
> *data)
>        * Listen to the 'cpu' scheduling filter constraint
>        * of events:
>        */
> -     if (!event_filter_match(event))
> +     if (!event_filter_match(event)) {
> +             if (event->tstamp != &params->ctx->tstamp_data)
> +                     event->tstamp = &params->ctx->tstamp_data;

this..

>               return 0;
> +     }
>  
>       /* may need to reset tstamp_enabled */
>       if (is_cgroup_event(event))


Are the magic spots, right? And I'm not convinced its right.

Suppose I have two events in my context, and I created them 1 minute
apart. Then their respective tstamp_enabled are 1 minute apart as well.
But the above doesn't seem to preserve that difference.

A similar argument can be made for running I think. That is a per event
value and cannot be passed along to the ctx and back.


Reply via email to