Hi Ingo,
I'm replying to your 3 mails at once.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 12:45:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It could become a useful scheduler benchmark !
> >
> > i just tried ocbench-0.3, and it is indeed very nice!
So as you've noticed just one minute after I put it there, I've updated
the tool and renamed it ocbench. For others, it's here :
http://linux.1wt.eu/sched/
Useful news are proper positionning, automatic forking, and more visible
progress with smaller windows, which eat less of X ressources.
Now about your idea of making it report information on stdout, I don't
know if it would be that useful. There are many other command line tools
for this purpose. This one's goal is to eat CPU with a visual control of
CPU distribution only.
Concerning your idea of using a signal to resync every process, I agree
with you. Running at 8x8 shows a noticeable offset. I've just uploaded
v0.4 which supports your idea of sending USR1.
> another thing i noticed: when using a -y larger then 1, then the window
> title (at least on Metacity) overlaps and thus the ocbench tasks have
> different X overhead and get scheduled a bit assymetrically as well. Is
> there any way to start them up title-less perhaps?
It has annoyed me a bit too, but I'm no X developer at all, so I don't
know at all if it's possible nor how to do this. I know that my window
manager even adds title bars to xeyes, so I'm not sure we can do this.
Right now, I've added a "-B <border size>" argument so that you can
skip the size of your title bar. It's dirty but it's not my main job :-)
Thanks for your feedback
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
