Hi,

Sorry I forgot to reply to all in my previous post :(
I hope this corrects things.

Le 28/07/2017 à 11:53, Neil Armstrong a écrit :

[snip]

+static long aoclk_cec_32k_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+                     unsigned long *prate)
+{
+    const struct cec_32k_freq_table *freq = find_cec_32k_freq(rate,
+                                  *prate);
+
+    /* If invalid return first one */
+    if (!freq)
+        return freq[0].target_rate;

Wouldn't this dereference a null pointer (or am I being stupid this morning)?

+
+    return freq->target_rate;
+}
+
+static int aoclk_cec_32k_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+                  unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+    const struct cec_32k_freq_table *freq = find_cec_32k_freq(rate,
+                                  parent_rate);
+    struct aoclk_cec_32k *cec_32k = to_aoclk_cec_32k(hw);
+    u32 reg = 0;
+
+    if (!freq)
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    /* Disable clock */
+    regmap_update_bits(cec_32k->regmap, AO_RTC_ALT_CLK_CNTL0,
+               CLK_CNTL0_IN_GATE_EN | CLK_CNTL0_OUT_GATE_EN, 0);
+
+    if (freq->dualdiv)
+        reg = CLK_CNTL0_DUALDIV_EN |
+              FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N1_MASK, freq->n1 - 1) |
+              FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N2_MASK, freq->n2 - 1);
+    else
+        reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N1_MASK, freq->n1 - 1);
+

Suggestion:

+    reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N1_MASK, freq->n1 - 1);
+    if (freq->dualdiv)
+        reg |= CLK_CNTL0_DUALDIV_EN |
+               FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL0_N2_MASK, freq->n2 - 1);

is shorter but maybe generates the same code.

+ regmap_write(cec_32k->regmap, AO_RTC_ALT_CLK_CNTL0, reg);
+
+    if (freq->dualdiv)
+        reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M1_MASK, freq->m1 - 1) |
+              FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M2_MASK, freq->m2 - 1);
+    else
+        reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M1_MASK, freq->m1 - 1);
+

Idem:

+    reg = FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M1_MASK, freq->m1 - 1);
+    if (freq->dualdiv)
+        reg |= FIELD_PREP(CLK_CNTL1_M2_MASK, freq->m2 - 1);

Cheers,
Chris

Reply via email to