On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:17:25AM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > s go ahead and think up great ideas for other ways of metering out cpu > >bandwidth for different purposes, but for X, given the absurd simplicity > >of renicing, why keep fighting it? Again I reiterate that most users of SD > >have not found the need to renice X anyway except if they stick to old > >habits of make -j4 on uniprocessor and the like, and I expect that those > >on CFS and Nicksched would also have similar experiences. > > Just plain "make" (no -j2 or -j9999) is enough to kill interactivity > on my 2GHz P-M single-core non-HT machine with SD.
Is this with or without X reniced? > But with the very first posted version of CFS by Ingo, > I can do "make -j2" no problem and still have a nicely interactive destop. How well does cfs run if you have the granularity set to something like 30ms (30000000)? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
