On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 11:11:30 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:54:54AM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > I put this change in a local tree together with other fixes / cleanups > > I plan to submit in the next weeks. Should I send it together with the > > other patches, or are you going to apply it separately? > > Posting them in a series is fine; it is customary to put independent > things first such that they will not get stuck after the larger changes. > > > In the first case, what is the correct authorship / SOB chain (I ask > > because I keep getting this wrong every time :) > > Yes, this is a 'fun' case :-) I'd just merge the change into your patch > introducing it and forget I 'contributed' the name change. I think this patch is independent from the other patches I have in my tree... So, I will go for the solution you describe below. Thanks, Luca > > For larger patches you could do something like (in your email body): > > > From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > > Changelog goes here... > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> > Signed-off-by: Luca... > --- > > $PATCH > > > Which says this patch is from me, carried by you, and then I'll stick > another SoB on to indicated I took it back. Its a bit weird, but we've > done it before.