On Thursday 19 April 2007 22:55, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:12:14PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Thursday 19 April 2007 10:41, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > On Thursday 19 April 2007 09:59, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > Since there is so much work currently ongoing with alternative cpu > > > > schedulers, as a standard for comparison with the alternative virtual > > > > deadline fair designs I've addressed a few issues in the Staircase > > > > Deadline cpu scheduler which improve behaviour likely in a noticeable > > > > fashion and released version 0.41. > > > > > > > > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.7-sd-0.41.pat > > > >ch > > > > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc7-sd-0.41.p > > > >atch > > > > > > > > and an incremental for those on 0.40: > > > > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc7/sched-imp > > > >leme nt -staircase-deadline-scheduler-further-improvements.patch > > > > > > > > Remember to renice X to -10 for nicest desktop behaviour :) > > > > > > > > Have fun. > > > > > > Oops forgot to cc a few people > > > > > > Nick you said I should still have something to offer so here it is. > > > Peter you said you never saw this design (it's a dual array affair > > > sorry). Gene and Willy you were some of the early testers that noticed > > > the advantages of the earlier designs, > > > Matt you did lots of great earlier testing. > > > WLI you inspired a lot of design ideas. > > > Mike you were the stick. > > > And a few others I've forgotten to mention and include. > > > > Version 0.42 > > > > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc7-sd-0.42.patch > > Will give it a shoot ASAP, probably this week-end. I'm too short in time > this week.
Great, thanks. By then there will almost certainly be a 0.43 so no rush. -- -ck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
