On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:40:37PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 20 July 2017 12:14 PM, Keerthy wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday 19 July 2017 04:40 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:14PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >>> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
> >>> return value appropriately.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> >>> index 2c88054..932f270 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> >>> @@ -233,15 +233,23 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct
> >>> platform_device *pdev)
> >>> chips->regs[bank] = gpio_base + offset_array[bank];
> >>>
> >>> ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &chips->chip, chips);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + goto err;
> >>> +
> >>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips);
> >>> + ret = davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev);
> >>> if (ret) {
> >>> - ctrl_num = 0;
> >>> - bank_base = 0;
> >>> - return ret;
> >>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> >>> + goto err;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips);
> >>> - davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev);
> >>> return 0;
> >>
> >> There's a separate but related bug here too as the clk_prepare_enable()
> >> in davinci_gpio_irq_setup() is never balanced on driver unbind.
> >
> > Yes Johan. I will send that as a separate patch.
>
> This is already fixed in the latest kernel:
>
> commit 6dc0048cff988858254fcc26becfc1e9753efa79
> Author: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue May 23 14:48:57 2017 +0530
That change only handles errors in davinci_gpio_irq_setup() (i.e. during
probe) and not the imbalance at driver unbind that I was referring to.
Johan
