On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > For example, maybe we can approximate it by spreading out the statistics: > right now you have things like > > - last_ran, wait_runtime, sum_wait_runtime.. > > be per-thread things. Maybe some of those can be spread out, so that you > put a part of them in the "struct vm_struct" thing (to approximate > processes), part of them in the "struct user" struct (to approximate the > user-level thing), and part of it in a per-container thing for when/if we > support that kind of thing?
I think Ingo's idea of a new sched_group to contain the generic parameters needed for the "key" calculation, works better than adding more fields to existing strctures (that would, of course, host pointers to it). Otherwise I can already the the struct_signal being the target for other unrelated fields :) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
