Alexey Budankov <alexey.budan...@linux.intel.com> writes: > On 18.07.2017 19:55, Alexander Shishkin wrote: >> Alexey Budankov <alexey.budan...@linux.intel.com> writes: >> >>> I see. Do you personally have some more issues that needs to be addressed? >>> My intention is that this patch v5 4/4 addresses all your comments raised >>> in >>> the previous reviews. >> >> I don't know yet, I haven't started on the actual content of the >> patchset, it being hard to read. I'm going to wait for more readable >> versions to look at the actual code. > > Is the whole final change attached to this patch v5 4/4 sufficient for you to > proceed?
No. As I've said yesterday here [1] and here [2], patches have to make sense on their own. I'm sure 'submitting-patches' also has something to that effect. > If not - please suggest the form which is more convenient for you. I've also answered this already in [3]: > Well, normally you'd be sending new versions of your patchset until the > maintainers are happy with it, at which point they'd pick it up. New > versions would address the issues pointed out during the review, also > keeping in mind the what 'submitting-patches' says about submitting > patches. [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150038199212005 [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150039142715304 [3] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150039054614993 Regards, -- Alex
