On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Casey Schaufler wrote: > those names it cares about. SELinux in the absence of a correct and > complete policy could be considered dangerous.
It should be noted that SELinux is only recommended as an addition to DAC, not a replacement, so that it can only further restrict existing access control. - James -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
