On Tuesday 17 April 2007 11:46:38 Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 03:47:32PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > >> Realy can't or don't want (?) > >> So who is responsible for potential changing Linux code licensing for > >> allow if not incorporate CDDL code correct interraction without breaking > >> some law ? > > > > Everyone who holds any copyright over any of the code in Linux, which is > > several thousand people. You'd probably need permission from all of > > them. Good luck! > > Why on discussion about switching to GPL v3 Linux code this argument was > allways taken as "piece of cake". Why in case switching to another license > which will allow use CDDL code just it is most importand contr argument ? > > kloczek
Because *EVERY* version of the GPL contains the "or any later version of this license" clause (except, now, the version being used with the Linux kernel) DRH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
