> And/or why Linux code licensing can't evolve ? Seems when Linux code was > licensed noone was thinking about case like interraction with code under > license like CDDL so why now it can be corrected and still many people try to > think like "anything arond Linux must evolve .. but not Linux" (?) > Why this can't be fixes ?
That's not evolution; it's de-evolution. Linux morphing to some sort of mentally-damaged pseudo-proprietary licence would be like switching back to a feudal society where 50 was considered unbelievably ancient. I'm sure Linus did think very closely about the interaction of his code with proprietary licences. He thought about it, snickered for a few moments, and made the right decision. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
